<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>johntracy.com - Latest Comments in Pictures from the Riverfront</title><link>http://johntracy.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://johntracy.disqus.com/pictures_from_the_riverfront/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:48:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Pictures from the Riverfront</title><link>http://www.johntracy.com/blog/2007/12/18/pictures-from-the-riverfront/#comment-2116442</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, they are both HDRs. I am not doing anything fancy on either, just a standard -2,0,+2 bracket. I am then throwing them in to photomatix, and then generating a tone mapped image, throwing that into Light Room to color correct and reduce noise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ok, now that I have re-read all of that, I realize that is fancy. But not overboard, just my general HDR workflow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:48:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pictures from the Riverfront</title><link>http://www.johntracy.com/blog/2007/12/18/pictures-from-the-riverfront/#comment-2116441</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cliche or not, these photos are beautiful! Did you use some sort of HDR treatment on these? I've played around HDR a time or two, but never liked my results. I have a feeling it doesn't work with all pictures though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pam Culver</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:26:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>